EN
AR

Freedom of movement during labor: five need-to-know insights

By Philips ∙ June 27 2025 ∙ 2 min read

Clinical article

Women's and maternal health

patient monitoring

A recent article [1] in the midwifery journal, Women and Birth, illuminates women’s experiences of wearing the Avalon beltless fetal monitoring solution, a form of continuous electronic fetal monitoring (CEFM), compared to a wired CTG.

At-a-glance

 
  • The Australian study including 15 women was collected via interviews within 12 weeks of them giving birth.
  • It is the first paper exploring women’s experiences of wearing the beltless non-invasive fetal ECG (NIFECG) device during labor.
  • Compared to previous experiences with wired CTG, women felt a greater sense of control when using the beltless non-invasive fetal ECG device.
  • Feeling unrestricted gave them a sense of physical freedom.

neonatal outcomes

Five take-aways from the article

1. Comfort “is 10 out of 10!”

 

Women found the beltless NIFECG device very comfortable. Many commented that it was lightweight and easy to apply. Once they got used to it, they would almost forget it was there, enabling them to focus on managing the pain of labor.

 

2. Bodily autonomy

 

Many of the women using CEFM were doing so because their pregnancy had been identified as high risk. Being labeled as high risk and experiencing the need for medical intervention, women sometimes felt their choices for labor and birth were diminished. In such circumstances, the capacity for women to move freely and fulfill bodily needs when using the beltless device led to a greater sense of choice and control.

 

3. Actively participating in labor

 

In comparison to previous experiences with wired CTG, women felt a greater sense of control when using the beltless NIFECG device. Feeling unrestricted, without being tethered to the machine by wires, gave them a sense of physical freedom, which had a positive psychological impact. When they were able to mobilize, not only did women experience the benefits of pain management, they also felt they were participating more actively in their labor.

 

4. Poking and prodding

 

When women were being monitored with CEFM, they were often disrupted by the midwife needing to adjust or reposition the wearable device in order to maintain a good trace of the fetal heart. Disruptive poking and prodding from caregivers occurred ‘frequently’ with CTG and ‘at times’ with the NIFECG device.

 

5. De-medicalized experience

 

Without the need for elastic belts, women were able to wear their regular clothes over the top of the NIFECG device. This not only made them feel more comfortable, but it also served to reduce the sense of their labor being a medicalized event.

Study: Australian womens' experiences wearing a non-invasive fetal ECG device during labor

We are always interested in engaging with you.

Let us know how we can help.

1
Select your area of interest
2
Contact details

Footnotes
 

Coddington R, Scarf V, Fox D. Australian women's experiences of wearing a non-invasive fetal electrocardiography (NIFECG) device during labour. Women Birth. 2023;36(6):546-551. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2023.03.005.

Disclaimers
 

Results are specific to the institution where they were obtained and may not reflect the results achievable at other institutions. Results in other cases may vary.

You are about to visit a Philips global content page

Continue

You are about to visit a Philips global content page

Continue

Our site can best be viewed with the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Firefox.